Version 0.5 preview - Page 15 - FamiTracker

# FamiTracker

FamiTracker Support Forums

Skip to content

## Version 0.5 preview

General discussion about tracking, help and support.
Post Reply

- Print view

295 posts

- Page 15 of 30
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- …
- 30
- Next

Baka94
  Posts: 54
  Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 5:15 pm

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by Baka94 » Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:40 am

The maximum frame limit still seems to be 128. Can you put it to 256? There is really no reason to limit it to 128, since there is clearly enough space for 256 frames
Top

HertzDevil
  Posts: 475
  Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:39 pm
  Location: Hong Kong SAR
  Contact:
  Contact HertzDevil
  Website Facebook Twitter Skype
  YouTube

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by HertzDevil » Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:44 am

FamiTracker readily supports up to 256 frames by changing MAX_FRAMES in FamiTrackerTypes.h. For ASM see this.
refactoring 0cc-famitracker
Top

iYamWhatIYam
  Posts: 432
  Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:19 pm
  Location: Fort Wayne, IN

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by iYamWhatIYam » Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:37 pm

I'd love to look at the beta, but I (as well as many others) don't have WinRAR. Could you possibly post the beta in a .zip folder?
i am the minestrone bottom | roxanne | she/they, 22
Top

retrodpc
  Posts: 194
  Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:05 am
  Location: !wow
  Contact:
  Contact retrodpc
  Website

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by retrodpc » Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:47 pm

I suggest getting 7zip as a libre alternative to WinZIP.
Don't copypasta Quotes
my sondclop
Top

Stratelier
  Posts: 378
  Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:46 pm

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by Stratelier » Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:18 pm

> iYamWhatIYam wrote:I'd love to look at the beta, but I (as well as many others) don't have WinRAR. Could you possibly post the beta in a .zip folder?

I have wondered about this ever since the topic was started.... older previews like 0.4.3 were posted in ZIP.
Top

8BitZtunerYT
  Posts: 379
  Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:20 pm
  Location: Somewhere stuck in Winamp

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by 8BitZtunerYT » Sat Jul 25, 2015 3:29 pm

I just noticed that if you export your song and set the region option in NSFplug/play to Force PAL, the song is in the same speed, just pitched down and the volume envelope being slower.
I'll post a comparion.
NTSC on the left ear, PAL on the right ear.
I think this happens with any expansion chip.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rcrfoqb6i7nfw ... L.mp3?dl=0
slowly ceasing to exist.
"8BitZ caresses his keyboard as he orgasms to the sounds of Winamp."
-retrodpc, 2015
Top

HertzDevil
  Posts: 475
  Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:39 pm
  Location: Hong Kong SAR
  Contact:
  Contact HertzDevil
  Website Facebook Twitter Skype
  YouTube

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by HertzDevil » Sat Jul 25, 2015 3:47 pm

When a different expansion chip is selected in Module Properties and the channel below the pattern editor cursor no longer exists by position, e.g. the cursor is on MMC5 Pulse 2 and FDS is used, the cursor fails to move back to the pattern editor area.
Last edited by HertzDevil on Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
refactoring 0cc-famitracker
Top

Dr. Merio
  Posts: 680
  Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:25 pm
  Location: On your screen
  Contact:
  Contact Dr. Merio
  Website Facebook Twitter Skype
  YouTube Google+

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by Dr. Merio » Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:06 pm

Detune settings still don't apply to the VRC7 expansion chip. Besides this, I love the newest beta version, especially the new N163 instrument editor!
My current avatar is why we need bigger avatars. >:C
Check out my YouTube channel!
[Dropbox (my FT stuff)]
Top

ollaxe
  Posts: 736
  Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2015 7:07 pm
  Location: Sweden
  Contact:
  Contact ollaxe
  Website Twitter YouTube Google+

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by ollaxe » Sun Jul 26, 2015 5:56 pm

I don't know if this was intended or not, but the 0xy-command works differently from before.
How it has worked in the past:
For every new note placed, the 0xy-command starts over.
Example:
In speed 1, this:

Code: Select all

`C-3 && 5 047
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
C-3 && 5 ---
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
--- -- 1 ---
`
is the same as this:

Code: Select all

`C-3 && 5 ---
E-3 && 4 ---
G-3 && 3 ---
C-3 && 2 ---
C-3 && 5 ---
E-3 && 4 ---
G-3 && 3 ---
C-3 && 2 ---
E-3 && 1 ---
`
How it works now:
It continues on and never resets itself, even when a new 0xy is placed down.
Example:
In speed 1, this:

Code: Select all

`C-3 && 5 047
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
C-3 && 5 ---
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
--- -- 1 ---
`
or this:

Code: Select all

`C-3 && 5 047
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
C-3 && 5 047
--- -- 4 ---
--- -- 3 ---
--- -- 2 ---
--- -- 1 ---
`
is the same as this:

Code: Select all

`C-3 && 5 ---
E-3 && 4 ---
G-3 && 3 ---
C-3 && 2 ---
E-3 && 5 ---
G-3 && 4 ---
C-3 && 3 ---
E-3 && 2 ---
G-3 && 1 ---
`
If this was not intended, then there has been a few glitches with how the instrument editor gets updated. Just out of pure curiousity, has this been reworked?
Hi! I'm not really active here anymore but I still make music. Nowadays I mostly make dubstep with emphasis on good melodies and chord progressions.
SoundCloud: soundcloud.com/ollaxe
Twitter: twitter.com/ollaxe
Discord server: dis.gd/tK7uRnc
I'm also on Spotify. Search "OllAxe" and you'll find me.
Top

HertzDevil
  Posts: 475
  Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:39 pm
  Location: Hong Kong SAR
  Contact:
  Contact HertzDevil
  Website Facebook Twitter Skype
  YouTube

### Re: Version 0.5 preview

- Quote

Post by HertzDevil » Sun Jul 26, 2015 7:19 pm

The 0xy effect resets its phase from 0.4.5 beta 1 to 0.5.0 beta 2. As a more concise example, there will be no arpeggios at all in this pattern:

Code: Select all

`ROW 00 : C-3 00 . 047 F01
ROW 01 : C-3 00 . ... ...
ROW 02 : C-3 00 . ... D00`
This is due to IaTM. In general there is no consensus over whether 0xy should reset the phase on trigger, but for other trackers their respective arpeggio effect usually resets their phase whenever used, because in these trackers the arpeggio is cancelled by simply not using the effect at all (that is, they must be manually continued with an arpeggio effect with zero parameter). I am not sure why it was removed in 0.5.0 beta 3.
refactoring 0cc-famitracker
Top

Display posts from previous:
Sort by

Post Reply

- Print view

295 posts

- Page 15 of 30
  - Jump to page:
- Previous
- 1
- …
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- …
- 30
- Next

Return to “General Talk”

Jump to

- Rules
- Wiki
- FamiTracker
- General Talk
- Bug Reports
- Feature Requests
- Source and development
- Music
- Original Music
- Cover Music
- Other
- Site Issues & Suggestions