Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker? - Page 5 - FamiTracker

# FamiTracker

FamiTracker Support Forums

Skip to content

## Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

General discussion about tracking, help and support.
Post Reply

- Print view

45 posts

- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5

Threxx
  Posts: 343
  Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:34 pm
  Location: Brooklyn, NY
  Contact:
  Contact Threxx
  Twitter Skype YouTube

### Re: Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

- Quote

Post by Threxx » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:16 pm

> Stratelier wrote:

> > Threxx wrote:0CC expands the frame limit to 256 instead of 128, effectively doubling the possible length of your work

> Let's crunch that. With a 60Hz engine speed, 128 frames of 256 rows (rounded down to 240 rows) gives you 8 1/2 minutes of song time; a 50Hz engine (at 250 rows per) allows up to 10 minutes of song time. More space than you could possibly need for most songs.

dancing mad is over 20 minutes long. you would have to be an absolute madman to cover that song at speed 1, but songs that are longer than 8.5 minutes exist...
Main Channel
Top

Xyz
  Posts: 297
  Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:36 pm

### Re: Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

- Quote

Post by Xyz » Wed Dec 09, 2015 9:49 pm

And ftms too!
http://famitracker.com/forum/attachment ... epkeep.ftm
>:( Fuck you hentai boy i hate you squid anus
Top

Stratelier
  Posts: 378
  Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:46 pm

### Re: Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

- Quote

Post by Stratelier » Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:56 am

> Threxx wrote:

> > Stratelier wrote:Let's crunch that. With a 60Hz engine speed, 128 frames of 256 rows (rounded down to 240 rows) gives you 8 1/2 minutes of song time; a 50Hz engine (at 250 rows per) allows up to 10 minutes of song time. More space than you could possibly need for most songs.

> dancing mad is over 20 minutes long. you would have to be an absolute madman to cover that song at speed 1, but songs that are longer than 8.5 minutes exist...

Which arrangement? (lol)
But seriously, yes there are always exceptions, I know that. But the majority of songs fit well under the five minute mark, and most NES songs specifically fit comfortably within three minutes if not two.
Top

JohnLeagsdurg
  Posts: 80
  Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 6:45 pm

### Re: Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

- Quote

Post by JohnLeagsdurg » Sun Mar 06, 2016 8:58 am

Sorry for necropost, but i've been attempting to get the hang out with 0CC.
I can't open 0.5.0 BETA ftm files somehow.
Top

HertzDevil
  Posts: 475
  Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 7:39 pm
  Location: Hong Kong SAR
  Contact:
  Contact HertzDevil
  Website Facebook Twitter Skype
  YouTube

### Re: Normal Famitracker or 0CC-FamiTracker?

- Quote

Post by HertzDevil » Sun Mar 06, 2016 4:28 pm

Why should any build other than 0.5.0 beta itself be able to load 0.5.0 beta FTMs?
EDIT: 0.5.0 beta module reading support is mostly added to 0CC-FamiTracker since August 3rd 2016.
refactoring 0cc-famitracker
Top

Display posts from previous:
Sort by

Post Reply

- Print view

45 posts

- Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5

Return to “General Talk”

Jump to

- Rules
- Wiki
- FamiTracker
- General Talk
- Bug Reports
- Feature Requests
- Source and development
- Music
- Original Music
- Cover Music
- Other
- Site Issues & Suggestions